User Tools

Site Tools


instructional_design:problem-based_learning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
instructional_design:problem-based_learning [2011/04/26 15:18]
jpetrovic [Criticisms]
instructional_design:problem-based_learning [2011/04/26 15:25]
jpetrovic [Criticisms]
Line 44: Line 44:
 Problem-based learning was addressed in [[learning_paradigms:​constructivism&#​criticisms]] of Kirschner et al.(([[http://​www.google.hr/​url?​sa=t&​source=web&​cd=1&​ved=0CBoQFjAA&​url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.169.8810%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&​rct=j&​q=Why%20minimal%20guidance%20during%20instruction%20does%20not%20work&​ei=yvSuTaKGCoySOuetze4B&​usg=AFQjCNGIE4wsl4Fg5fVtGlt3UdZOoLrP2A&​cad=rja|Kirschner,​ P. A, J. Sweller, and R. E Clark. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist,​ discovery, problem-based,​ experiential,​ and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist 41, no. 2: 75–86. 2006.]])) These criticisms mostly refer to cognitive load imposed by **lack of guidance**, possible **frustration** caused by lack of knowing what is important, what should be learned and where these information can be obtained. It also ignores the proved positive effects of **worked examples**. Problem-based learning was addressed in [[learning_paradigms:​constructivism&#​criticisms]] of Kirschner et al.(([[http://​www.google.hr/​url?​sa=t&​source=web&​cd=1&​ved=0CBoQFjAA&​url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.169.8810%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&​rct=j&​q=Why%20minimal%20guidance%20during%20instruction%20does%20not%20work&​ei=yvSuTaKGCoySOuetze4B&​usg=AFQjCNGIE4wsl4Fg5fVtGlt3UdZOoLrP2A&​cad=rja|Kirschner,​ P. A, J. Sweller, and R. E Clark. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist,​ discovery, problem-based,​ experiential,​ and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist 41, no. 2: 75–86. 2006.]])) These criticisms mostly refer to cognitive load imposed by **lack of guidance**, possible **frustration** caused by lack of knowing what is important, what should be learned and where these information can be obtained. It also ignores the proved positive effects of **worked examples**.
  
-A reply to these criticisms was written by Schmidt et al.(([[http://​www.cogtech.usc.edu/​publications/​schmidt_etal_ep07.pdf|Schmidt,​ H. G, S. M.M Loyens, T. Van Gog, and F. Paas. Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture:​ Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42, no. 2: 91–97. 2007.]])) suggesting positive **characteristics/​improvements** to problem-based learning and compatibility of it with the human cognitive structure like:+A reply to these criticisms was written by Schmidt et al.(([[http://​www.cogtech.usc.edu/​publications/​schmidt_etal_ep07.pdf|Schmidt,​ H. G, S. M.M Loyens, T. Van Gog, and F. Paas. Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture:​ Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42, no. 2: 91–97. 2007.]])) and Hmelo-Silver et al.(([[http://​www.cogtech.usc.edu/​publications/​hmelo_ep07.pdf|Hmelo-Silver,​ C. E, R. G Duncan, and C. A Chinn. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42, no. 2: 99–107. 2007.)) suggesting positive **characteristics/​improvements** to problem-based learning and compatibility of it with the human cognitive structure like:
  
   * activation of **prior knowledge** in the initial discussion of the group,   * activation of **prior knowledge** in the initial discussion of the group,
instructional_design/problem-based_learning.txt · Last modified: 2023/06/19 18:03 (external edit)