This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
instructional_design:structural_learning [2011/03/15 15:26] jpetrovic [General] |
instructional_design:structural_learning [2011/03/16 08:53] jpetrovic [What is structural learning theory?] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===== General ===== | ===== General ===== | ||
- | Structural learning theory is one of the [[learning_paradigms:cognitivism|cognitivist]] perspectives on instructional design proposed by [[http://www.scandura.com/|Joseph Scandura]] in 1970s. Scandura's theory suggests human knowledge is consisted of rules which are to be learned. Rules are determined by parameters of domain, procedure, and range. | + | Structural learning theory is one of the [[learning_paradigms:cognitivism|cognitivist]] perspectives on instructional design proposed by [[http://www.scandura.com/|Joseph Scandura]] in 1970s. Scandura's theory suggests human **knowledge is** consisted of **rules** which are to be learned. Those rules are determined by parameters of **domain**, **procedure**, and **range**. |
===== What is structural learning theory? ===== | ===== What is structural learning theory? ===== | ||
- | Each rule, according to has domain, range and operation as its parameters. **Domain** refers to its **applicable inputs**, **range** refers its **expected outputs** and **operation** reffers to the **procedure on the inputs**. New rules are learned through application off higher to lower order rules. | + | Structural learning theory suggests that structures (problems) that a learner must learn, need to be formed as rules. Those rules can be simplified into **lower-order rules** (//atomic components//) which represent most basic concepts learner needs to know when dealing with a problem from given domain. By combining these atomic components and application of more complicated to lower order rules new **higher-order rules** are derived. Higher-order rules are rules which can have other rules as inputs or outputs and they can be used to solve complex problems in the whole domain. |
- | In accordance with structural learning theory, first step in instructional design or learning is **definition of the problem domain through structural analysis**. Problem domain can be both well- and ill-defined (when rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should be divided into well-defined sub-domains which generate at least one rule. Domain sets the inputs and desired outputs for problem solving. | + | Rules, according to the structural learning theory have three parameters: |
+ | |||
+ | * **domain** - its allowed **inputs**, | ||
+ | * **range** - its expected outputs, and | ||
+ | * **procedure** - the sequence of **operations** to perform **on the inputs**. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In accordance with structural learning theory, first step in instructional design or learning is **definition of the problem domain through structural analysis**. Problem domain can be both well- and ill-defined((An ill-defined domain is one in which rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing.)). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should be divided into well-defined sub-domains which can generate at least one rule. Domain sets the inputs and desired outputs for problem solving. | ||
Domain definition is followed by **construction of hierarchy of rules** for well-defined domains. Rules should be explained on prototype problems, but can also leave some **gaps** in problem solving procedure, which **are then converted into higher-order problems** containing gap rules. Higher-order rules are then used to fill the gap, but can also validate lower level rules. | Domain definition is followed by **construction of hierarchy of rules** for well-defined domains. Rules should be explained on prototype problems, but can also leave some **gaps** in problem solving procedure, which **are then converted into higher-order problems** containing gap rules. Higher-order rules are then used to fill the gap, but can also validate lower level rules. | ||
Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
===== Bibliography ===== | ===== Bibliography ===== | ||
- | [[http://web.cortland.edu/frieda/id/IDtheories/4.html|Structural Learning Theory.]] | + | [[http://web.cortland.edu/frieda/id/IDtheories/4.html|Instructional Design Theory Database Project: Structural Learning Theory.]] Retrieved March 15, 2011. |
[[http://www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Class_Websites/761_Spring_04/Assets/course_docs/ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura, J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]] | [[http://www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Class_Websites/761_Spring_04/Assets/course_docs/ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura, J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]] |