User Tools

Site Tools


instructional_design:structural_learning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
instructional_design:structural_learning [2011/03/15 15:26]
jpetrovic [General]
instructional_design:structural_learning [2011/03/16 09:03]
jpetrovic [What is structural learning theory?]
Line 4: Line 4:
 ===== General ===== ===== General =====
  
-Structural learning theory is one of the [[learning_paradigms:​cognitivism|cognitivist]] perspectives on instructional design proposed by [[http://​www.scandura.com/​|Joseph Scandura]] in 1970s. Scandura'​s theory suggests human knowledge is consisted of rules which are to be learned. ​Rules are determined by parameters of domain, procedure, and range.+Structural learning theory is one of the [[learning_paradigms:​cognitivism|cognitivist]] perspectives on instructional design proposed by [[http://​www.scandura.com/​|Joseph Scandura]] in 1970s. Scandura'​s theory suggests human **knowledge is** consisted of **rules** which are to be learned. ​Those rules are determined by parameters of **domain****procedure**, and **range**.
  
  
 ===== What is structural learning theory? ===== ===== What is structural learning theory? =====
  
-Each ruleaccording ​to has domain, range and operation ​as its parameters. **Domain** refers ​to its **applicable inputs**, **range** refers its **expected outputs** ​and **operation** reffers ​to the **procedure on the inputs**. New rules are learned through application off higher ​to lower order rules.+Structural learning theory suggests that structures (problems) that a learner must learnneed to be formed ​as rulesThose rules can be simplified into **lower-order rules** (//atomic components//​) which represent most basic concepts learner needs to know when dealing with a problem from given domain. By combining these atomic components ​and application of more complicated ​to lower order rules new **higher-order rules** are derivedHigher-order ​rules are rules which can have other rules as inputs or outputs (for example mathematical theorems) and they can be used to solve complex problems in the whole domain.
  
-In accordance with structural learning theory, first step in instructional design or learning is **definition of the problem domain through structural analysis**. Problem domain can be both well- and ill-defined (when rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should be divided into well-defined sub-domains which generate at least one rule. Domain sets the inputs and desired outputs for problem solving.+Rules, according to the structural learning theory have three parameters:​ 
 + 
 +  * **domain** - its allowed **inputs**,​ 
 +  * **range** - its expected outputs, and 
 +  * **procedure** - the sequence of **operations** to perform **on the inputs**.  
 + 
 +In accordance with structural learning theory, first step in instructional design or learning is **definition of the problem domain through structural analysis**. Problem domain can be both well- and ill-defined((An ill-defined domain is one in which rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing.)). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should be divided into well-defined sub-domains which can generate at least one rule. Domain sets the inputs and desired outputs for problem solving.
  
 Domain definition is followed by **construction of hierarchy of rules** for well-defined domains. Rules should be explained on prototype problems, but can also leave some **gaps** in problem solving procedure, which **are then converted into higher-order problems** containing gap rules. Higher-order rules are then used to fill the gap, but can also validate lower level rules. Domain definition is followed by **construction of hierarchy of rules** for well-defined domains. Rules should be explained on prototype problems, but can also leave some **gaps** in problem solving procedure, which **are then converted into higher-order problems** containing gap rules. Higher-order rules are then used to fill the gap, but can also validate lower level rules.
Line 31: Line 37:
 ===== Bibliography ===== ===== Bibliography =====
  
-[[http://​web.cortland.edu/​frieda/​id/​IDtheories/​4.html|Structural Learning Theory.]]+[[http://​web.cortland.edu/​frieda/​id/​IDtheories/​4.html|Instructional Design Theory Database Project: ​Structural Learning Theory.]] ​Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  
 [[http://​www.odu.edu/​educ/​roverbau/​Class_Websites/​761_Spring_04/​Assets/​course_docs/​ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/​Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura,​ J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]] [[http://​www.odu.edu/​educ/​roverbau/​Class_Websites/​761_Spring_04/​Assets/​course_docs/​ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/​Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura,​ J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]]
instructional_design/structural_learning.txt · Last modified: 2023/06/19 18:03 (external edit)