This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
knowledge_assessment:q-matrix [2012/07/04 16:14] jpetrovic |
knowledge_assessment:q-matrix [2012/07/05 10:09] jpetrovic |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Q-matrix is a | Q-matrix is a | ||
* "//method, which examines the inputs of many students to automatically extract relationships between questions and underlying concepts, and then uses those relationships in diagnosing and correcting student misconceptions.//" | * "//method, which examines the inputs of many students to automatically extract relationships between questions and underlying concepts, and then uses those relationships in diagnosing and correcting student misconceptions.//" | ||
- | * omain-independent knowledge model | + | * domain-independent knowledge model |
+ | * originally a binary matrix showing the relationship between test items and latent or underlying attributes, or concepts | ||
+ | * To build the q-matrix, experts constructed a relationship between test questions and concepts (referred to as attributes) and students taking the test were assigned knowledge states based on their test answers and the constructed q-matrix ((see Ham85 for a discussion of item-response theory)) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:knowledge_assessment:qm.jpg}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Approaches: | ||
+ | * Hand construction of the q-matrix by experts' assigning concepts to questions and then comparing student answers to closest matrix responses. Problems: a q-matrix is a much more abstract measure of the relationships of questions to concepts. We might assume that the | ||
+ | questions designed to test students are a more accurate reflection of the teaching objectives than an abstract construct which relates questions to underlying concepts. | ||
+ | * |