This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
learning_paradigms:behaviorism [2011/06/28 13:43] jpetrovic [About behaviorism] |
learning_paradigms:behaviorism [2011/06/28 14:21] jpetrovic [Criticisms] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===== Behaviorist learning theories: ===== | ===== Behaviorist learning theories: ===== | ||
- | Among below listed learning theories within behaviorist framework, connectionism presents an introduction to behaviorist learning and setting its frames followed by true behaviorist learning perspectives of classical and operand conditioning. | + | Among below listed learning theories within behaviorist framework, connectionism presents an introduction to behaviorist learning and setting its frames followed by true behaviorist learning perspectives of classical and operand conditioning. |
- | Sign learning appeared as first neobehaviorist theory, followed by drive reduction theory, which also incorporated idea of describing learning with intervening variables. Neobehaviorist started the transition to cognitivism and finally rejection of behaviorism as dominant learning paradigm. | + | Sign learning appeared as first neobehaviorist theory, followed by drive reduction theory, which also incorporated idea of describing learning with intervening variables. |
* [[learning_theories:Connectionism]] - [[http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/thorndike.htm|Edward Thorndike (1874 - 1949)]] | * [[learning_theories:Connectionism]] - [[http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/thorndike.htm|Edward Thorndike (1874 - 1949)]] | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* **does not explain all kinds o learning** since it ignores inner mind activities, | * **does not explain all kinds o learning** since it ignores inner mind activities, | ||
* offers a very limited view on learning since it **ignores internal factors** such as emotions or motivation, | * offers a very limited view on learning since it **ignores internal factors** such as emotions or motivation, | ||
- | * ignores fact that learning depends on learner's **inner** subjective **representation of environment and learning history**. | + | * ignores fact that learning depends on learner's inner subjective representation of environment and learning history. |