This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
learning_theories:experiential_learning [2011/08/17 14:43] jpetrovic [Criticisms] |
learning_theories:experiential_learning [2011/08/17 14:57] jpetrovic [Criticisms] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
* his learning cycle pays insufficient attention to goals, purposes, intentions, choice and decision-making, which are also a part of learning(([[http://books.google.com/books?id=M3zsc-MJaSwC|Harrison, R. Supporting Lifelong Learning: Perspectives on learning. Routledge, 2002.]])) | * his learning cycle pays insufficient attention to goals, purposes, intentions, choice and decision-making, which are also a part of learning(([[http://books.google.com/books?id=M3zsc-MJaSwC|Harrison, R. Supporting Lifelong Learning: Perspectives on learning. Routledge, 2002.]])) | ||
* the results of //learning style inventory// are based solely on the way learners rate themselves which results in questionable results(([[http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Experiential/|Curtis, K. David Kolb, The Theory of Experiential Learning and ESL. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. 3(9), September 1997.]])) | * the results of //learning style inventory// are based solely on the way learners rate themselves which results in questionable results(([[http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Experiential/|Curtis, K. David Kolb, The Theory of Experiential Learning and ESL. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. 3(9), September 1997.]])) | ||
- | * doubts that not everyone's learning process has to undergo Kolb's stages and **not necessarily in that order**, | ||
- | * **lack of experimental research** and too simplified learning cycle which ignores non-experiential learning, and | ||
- | * not paying enough attention to the process of **reflection** and **lack of precision**. | ||
- | |||