This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
learning_theories:social_development_theory [2011/04/19 13:17] jpetrovic [General] |
learning_theories:social_development_theory [2011/04/19 13:29] jpetrovic [Criticisms] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== General ===== | ===== General ===== | ||
- | Social development theory was introduced in 1920s by [[http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/|Lev Vygotsky]], whos theory is according to some the origin of social constructivism(([[http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v6n3/liu/paper.pdf|Liu, C. H, and R. Matthews. Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal 6, no. 3: 386–399. 2005.]] | + | Social development theory was introduced in 1920s by [[http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/|Lev Vygotsky]], whose theory is according to some the origin of social constructivism(([[http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v6n3/liu/paper.pdf|Liu, C. H, and R. Matthews. Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal 6, no. 3: 386–399. 2005.]] |
)). This theory, sometimes also called **cultural-history theory** or //social constructivism// gives a **framework for cognitive development** in children and argues that the **key role in cognition development** lies in **social interactions**. In his own words, | )). This theory, sometimes also called **cultural-history theory** or //social constructivism// gives a **framework for cognitive development** in children and argues that the **key role in cognition development** lies in **social interactions**. In his own words, | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* it doesn't take into consideration **gender differences**, | * it doesn't take into consideration **gender differences**, | ||
- | * underestimates abilities of an individual, | + | * underestimates abilities and ignores role of an individual, |
+ | * does not address the issue of how outer world is brifget to internal mind, | ||
* valuing performance children accomplish together may result in children **becoming lazy** and expecting help even when they can accomplish something on their own.((Santrock, John W. Child development. McGraw-Hill, 2003.)) | * valuing performance children accomplish together may result in children **becoming lazy** and expecting help even when they can accomplish something on their own.((Santrock, John W. Child development. McGraw-Hill, 2003.)) | ||
===== Keywords and most important names ===== | ===== Keywords and most important names ===== |