This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
research_results:spatial_contiguity_principle [2011/06/08 15:48] jpetrovic [Practice] |
research_results:spatial_contiguity_principle [2011/06/08 16:14] jpetrovic [Research status] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===== Research status ===== | ===== Research status ===== | ||
- | Experiments have confirmed importance of this principle(([[http://visuallearningresearch.wiki.educ.msu.edu/file/view/Chandler+%26+Sweller+(1991).pdf|Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. 1991.]])) | + | Experiments have confirmed importance of this principle(([[http://visuallearningresearch.wiki.educ.msu.edu/file/view/Chandler+%26+Sweller+(1991).pdf|Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. 1991.]])), yet similar results were sometimes obtained using not necessarily spatial contiguity, but **segmenting text** and **labeling the image** as key contributors to it.(([[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475209000358|Florax, Mareike, and Rolf Ploetzner. What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and spatial proximity. Learning and Instruction 20, no. 3: 216-224. June 2010.]])) |