This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
behaviorism [2011/01/18 09:18] admin [Critic] |
— (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Behaviorism ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== About behaviorism ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | Some of the oldest learning theories belong to the behaviorism as [[learning_paradigms|learning paradigm]] and date back from the beginning of the 20th century. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Behaviorists view **learning as a visible change in ones behavior**. Behaviorism assumes that the learner starts off as a clear state and simply responds to environmental stimuli. Those responses **can be shaped through positive and negative reinforcement** increasing or decreasing the probability of repeating the same behavior. | ||
| - | |||
| - | The key component to this paradigm are observable behaviors and their measuring. | ||
| - | ===== Learning theories: ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | * [[Clasicall conditioning]] ([[http://www.ivanpavlov.com/|Ivan Pavlov]], 1849-1936) | ||
| - | * [[Operant conditioning]] ([[http://www.bfskinner.org/BFSkinner/AboutSkinner.html|Burrhus Skinner]], 1904-1990) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Critic ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | Behaviorism today mostly **lost its influence** and let **cognitivism take its place** as the dominant paradigm. Critics of behaviorist learning usually argue that behaviorism **does not explain all kinds o learning** since it ignores inner mind activities. Behaviorism also neglects the fact that behavior also depends on learners inner subjective representation of environment and learning history. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Read more ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | [[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/behaviorism/|Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: Behaviorism]] | ||