User Tools

Site Tools


cognitive_theory_of_multimedia_learning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cognitive_theory_of_multimedia_learning [2011/01/31 13:13]
jpetrovic [What is cognitive theory of multimedia learning?]
— (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning ====== 
- 
- 
-===== General ===== 
- 
- 
-Cognitive theory of multimedia learning is one of the [[cognitivism|cognitivist learning theories]] introduced by an American psychology professor [[http://​www.psych.ucsb.edu/​people/​faculty/​mayer/​index.php|Richard Meyer]] in 1990s. Basic assumption of his theory is that the **human working memory** has **two sub-components** that **work in parallel** (visual and verbal/​acoustic) and that learning can be more successful if both of this channels are used for information processing at the same time.  
- 
- 
-===== What is cognitive theory of multimedia learning? ===== 
- 
-The suggestion that human working memory has more sub-components firstly came from the working memory models designed by A. Baddeley and G. Hitch in 1974. These findings where further incorporated to the [[http://​tip.psychology.org/​paivio.html|Dual coding theory]] by A. Paivio and later by Mayer and his colleagues. 
- 
-In his theory Mayer started building his [[images:​information_channels|model]] from the assumption that the **audio and video channels in our working memory are separated** and can be used for processing information simultaneously thus enhancing process of learning (//The Modality principle//​). Also, he recognizes that, as Miller'​s [[http://​tip.psychology.org/​miller.html|Information processing theory]] has shown, **these channels have limited capacity**. His third assumption is that learning is an active process of collecting, organizing and integrating new information. 
- 
-These assumptions lead to the conclusion that, taking into consideration cognitive load, **learning process can be improved** by **providing learning material** to the learner **simultaneously through both channels**. Mayer proved this concepts through conducted experiments(([[http://​www.google.hr/​url?​sa=t&​source=web&​cd=1&​ved=0CBoQFjAA&​url=http%3A%2F%2Fvisuallearningresearch.wiki.educ.msu.edu%2Ffile%2Fview%2FMayer%2B%2526%2BAnderson%2B(1991).pdf&​ei=cbVGTcKAMIHtsgbKh4GpDg&​usg=AFQjCNHHnSkhRE-lYgO5fIpw9NfISsk3Wg|Mayer,​ R. E. & Anderson, R. B. Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. ​ Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490. 1990.]])). ​   
- 
-There are several important **principles of cognitive theory of multimedia learning** identified by Mayer: 
- 
-  * **Modality principle** - applies to the idea that humans have a separated visual/​pictorial and auditory/​verbal channel for information processing that can work in parallel, but have limited capacity. **Using both channels can enhance learning**. 
-  * **Redundancy principle** - refers to the fact that **capacity of both channels can unnecessarily be overloaded by redundant information** presented through both channels thereby negatively affecting learning process. 
-  * **Spatial contiguity principle** - **information processing is easier when less cognitive effort is needed**. For example, text placed near the referred place in the diagram will result in more successful learning than if it is placed under the diagram. ([[images:​spatial_examples|Example from Mayer'​s "​Multimedia Learning"​]]) 
-  * **Temporal contiguity principle** - **simultaneous presentation should be most similar to the way human mind operates** and has provided best experimental results, same as presenting them with very short time differences. 
-  * **Coherence principle** - claims that **extraneous material** that may be interesting or motivating but is irrelevant and generally **wastes learning resources**. ​ 
-  * **Individual differences principle** - emphasizes influence of prior knowledge to results of learning. Design effects are stronger for learners with little prior knowledge, which results in **different optimal instructional design** for **intermediate learners or beginners**. 
- 
-===== What is the practical meaning of cognitive theory of multimedia learning? ===== 
- 
- 
-Principles of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning have a rather practical application in educational theory. As stated by Mayer in his book "Media learning",​ meaning of the principals (in order they are introduced above) can be described as follows: 
- 
-  * Students learn better from words and pictures than from words alone 
-  * Students learn better from animation and narration together than only from animation or narration or on-screen text 
-  * Students learn better when corresponding words and pictures are presented close rather than far from each other on the page or screen 
-  * Students learn better when corresponding words and pictures are presented simultaneously rather than one after another 
-  * Students learn better when extraneous material is excluded rather than included 
-  * All of this design effects are stronger for low-knowledge learners than for high knowledge learners, and for high-spatial learners rather than for low-spatial learners 
-===== Keywords and most important names ===== 
- 
-  * **Cognitive theory of multimedia learning**, **dual coding theory**, **visual and verbal/​acoustic channel**, **modality principle**,​ **redundancy principle**,​ **spatial contiguity principle**,​ **temporal contiguity principle**,​ **coherence principle**,​ **individual differences principle** 
-  * [[http://​www.psych.ucsb.edu/​people/​faculty/​mayer/​index.php|Richard Mayer]] 
- 
- 
-===== Bibliography ===== 
- 
-[[http://​www.presentationfacts.com/​index.php/​2005/​12/​04/​a-cognitive-theory-of-multimedia-learning/​|“A Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning » Presentation Facts.”]] 
- 
-[[http://​visuallearningresearch.wiki.educ.msu.edu/​file/​view/​Mayer,​+Heiser,​+%26+Lonn+%282001%29.pdf |Mayer, R. E, J. Heiser, and S. Lonn. “Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93, no. 1 (2001): 187–198.]] 
- 
-[[http://​books.google.hr/​books?​id=ymJ9o-w_6WEC&​printsec=frontcover&​dq=Mayer+2001&​hl=hr&​ei=IFMsTeWCHJH2sgantPDiBw&​sa=X&​oi=book_result&​ct=result&​resnum=1&​ved=0CCQQ6AEwAA#​v=onepage&​q=Mayer%202001&​f=false|Mayer,​ Richard E. Multimédia learning. Cambridge University Press, 2001.]] 
- 
-[[http://​www.bookrags.com/​wiki/​Multimedia_learning|BookRags:​ Multimedia learning]] 
- 
-===== Read more ===== 
- 
-Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J. Working Memory. In Bower, G.A. The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. 8. New York: Academic Press. pp. 47–89. 1974. 
- 
-Moreno, R., and Mayer, Richard E. Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91, no. 2: p358-368. June 1999. 
- 
-[[http://​visuallearningresearch.wiki.educ.msu.edu/​file/​view/​Mayer+%26+Sims+%281994%29.pdf/​50533673/​Mayer+%26+Sims+%281994%29.pdf|Mayer,​ R. E, and V. K Sims. “For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning.” Journal of educational psychology 86 (1994): 389–389.]] 
  
cognitive_theory_of_multimedia_learning.1296479631.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/19 15:49 (external edit)