knowledge_assessment:learning_outcomes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
knowledge_assessment:learning_outcomes [2012/05/15 08:29] jpetrovic [Revised Bloom's taxonomy] |
knowledge_assessment:learning_outcomes [2023/06/19 16:03] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ^^ ^ Type ^^ Definition ^ Examples ^ | ^^ ^ Type ^^ Definition ^ Examples ^ | ||
| - | ^^ 1. ^ Declarative knowledge ^ Factual knowledge |The knowledge of facts or the basic elements students must know to be acquainted with a discipline or solve problems in it. |Technical vocabulary ("//What is a keyboard?//"), chemical elements ("//Which chemical element is represented by symbol Au?//), colors (//Which color is [[knowledge_assessment:learning_outcomes|this text]]?//, numbers (//What is the symbol commonly used for number five?//), trees (//State latin names of at least three fastest growing trees?//), formulas (//Define the quadratic formula?//), cities ("//What is the capital of Azerbajdan?"//), dates and time ("//In what year did the U.S. gain independence?"//). | | + | ^^ 1. ^ Declarative knowledge ^ Factual knowledge |The knowledge of **facts or the basic elements** students must know to be acquainted with a discipline or solve problems in it. |Knowhedge that a a keyboard is a computer device, that chemical symbol //Au// represents gold, that [[knowledge_assessment:learning_outcomes|this color]] is called green, that //7// is the symbol for number 7, knowledge of names of three fastest growing trees, knowledge of the definition of the quadratic formula, knowledge that hte capital of Azerbajdan is Baku, knowledge that the U.S. gained independence in 1776. | |
| - | ^^ 2. ^ ::: ^ Conceptual knowledge |The interrelationships among the basic elements within a larger structure that enable them to function together. |Law of supply and demand, color theory, forms of business ownership, categories of cars or rock music. | | + | ^^ 2. ^ ::: ^ Conceptual knowledge |Conceptual knowledge reffers to **patterns and interrelationships** among the basic elements within a larger structure that enable them to function together. |Knowledge of categories (concepts) like cars, dogs or rock music. Knowledge about similarities and patterns in factual knowledge elements, for example forms of business ownership. | |
| - | ^^ 3. ^ Procedural knowledge ||How to do something, methods of inquiry, and criteria for using skills, algorithms, techniques, and methods. |Whole-number division algorithm, interviewing techniques. | | + | ^^ 3. ^ Procedural knowledge ||How to do something, methods of inquiry, and criteria for using skills, algorithms, techniques, and methods. |[[http://mason.gmu.edu/~mmankus/whole/base10/asmdb10.htm|Whole-number division algorithm]], [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greedy_algorithm|greedy algorithm]], [[http://jurnalinternasional.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/dpsequencing.pdf|Held–Karp algorithm]], [[http://www.coop.eng.umd.edu/documents/handouts_2005/7Interviewing%20Techniques.pdf|interviewing techniques]], [[http://math.berkeley.edu/~shaowei/math1b/finformula.pdf|differential equation solving techniques]], [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaze_heuristic|gaze heuristic]], [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Similarity_heuristic|similarity heuristic]]. | |
| ^^ 4. ^ Metacognitive knowledge ||Knowledge of cognition in general as well as awareness and knowledge of one’s own cognition(([[http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477406|Pintrich, Paul R. The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Theory into Practice 41, no. 4: 219-225, October 2002.]])). |Knowledge of outlining as a means of capturing the structure of a unit subject matter in a textbook, knowledge of the use of heuristics, knowledge of the types of tests particular teachers administer, knowledge of the cognitive demands of different tasks. | | ^^ 4. ^ Metacognitive knowledge ||Knowledge of cognition in general as well as awareness and knowledge of one’s own cognition(([[http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477406|Pintrich, Paul R. The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Theory into Practice 41, no. 4: 219-225, October 2002.]])). |Knowledge of outlining as a means of capturing the structure of a unit subject matter in a textbook, knowledge of the use of heuristics, knowledge of the types of tests particular teachers administer, knowledge of the cognitive demands of different tasks. | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note that [[knowledge_assessment:types_if_knowledge|other suggestions of knowledge types]] exist as well. | ||
| The taxonomy itself was subjected to some changes. Those changes include the changes in the terminology of the learning outcomes and in adding a second dimension of mentioned knowledge types to the taxonomy. The new taxonomy is therefore two dimensional and consists of four types of knowledge on one axis and six types of cognitive processes (learning outcomes) that can be performed on them(([[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NQM/is_4_41/ai_94872707/|Krathwohl, David R. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into practice 41, no. 4, Autumn 2002.]]))(([[http://books.google.hr/books?id=JPkXAQAAMAAJ|L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, and B. S. Bloom, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2001.]])): | The taxonomy itself was subjected to some changes. Those changes include the changes in the terminology of the learning outcomes and in adding a second dimension of mentioned knowledge types to the taxonomy. The new taxonomy is therefore two dimensional and consists of four types of knowledge on one axis and six types of cognitive processes (learning outcomes) that can be performed on them(([[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NQM/is_4_41/ai_94872707/|Krathwohl, David R. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into practice 41, no. 4, Autumn 2002.]]))(([[http://books.google.hr/books?id=JPkXAQAAMAAJ|L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, and B. S. Bloom, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2001.]])): | ||
knowledge_assessment/learning_outcomes.1337070599.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/19 15:49 (external edit)
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
