Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- learning_theories:clasicall_conditioning [2012/01/12 10:42]
127.0.0.1 external edit
+++ learning_theories:clasicall_conditioning [2023/06/19 16:03] (current)
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ===== Criticisms =====
-Classical conditioning was experimentally confirmed and cannot be rejected as a learning theory, but its **scope is limited** and it ignores all cognitive aspects. It has until today almost completely **lost its influence**. Meaningful criticisms were also offered by **[[learning_theories:gestalt_psychology|gestalt psychologists]]** who later inspired **[[learning_paradigms:cognitivism|cognitivist ideas]]** of explaining the human cognitive structure. Models of human cognitive structure developed in 1960s have suggested humans are capable of learning forms superior to stimulus-response learning.
+Classical conditioning is experimentally confirmed and cannot be rejected as a learning theory, but its **scope is limited** and it ignores all cognitive aspects of learning, so it has lost most of its influence today, especially in context of educational psychology. Meaningful criticisms were also offered by **[[learning_theories:gestalt_psychology|gestalt psychologists]]** who later inspired **[[learning_paradigms:cognitivism|cognitivist ideas]]** of explaining the human cognitive structure. Models of human cognitive structure developed in 1960s have suggested humans are capable of learning forms superior to stimulus-response learning.

Learning Theories