This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
scripts [2011/01/14 13:15] admin |
— (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ===== Script Theory ===== | ||
| - | Script theory, developed by [[http://www.rogerschank.com/|Roger Schank]], is orientated mostly on structure of knowledge, especially on representation of more complex event sequences in memory. | ||
| - | |||
| - | There are several definitions of scriptst like a coherent sequence of events expected by an individual in a particular context, involving him either as participant or as an observer (Christopher Puto), or a “mental picture plus caption” representing the action sequences, participants, and physical objects found in a situation (Robert Abelson). | ||
| - | |||
| - | These structures are called scripts and represent elements indicative of repeated experiences | ||
| - | of events. According to script theory - that is a specific | ||
| - | elaboration of Minsky’s frame theory (Bower, Black & | ||
| - | Turner, 1979:178) - a script consists of a sequence of | ||
| - | goal directed actions that are causally and temporally | ||
| - | ordered and includes the relevant people, objects and | ||
| - | locations (Sutherland, 1995:413; Bower et al, | ||
| - | 1979:178). | ||
| - | |||
| - | Experimental evidence of the psychological reality of | ||
| - | schemata and scripts has accumulated since | ||
| - | (Vosniadou, 1996:403; Eysenck, 1994:316, 317; | ||
| - | Searleman & Herrmann, 1994:125). Modern versions | ||
| - | of the schema theory play a prominent role in current | ||
| - | theories of memory (Eysenck, 1994:316). Of specific | ||
| - | importance for this article, is that theorists within the | ||
| - | broad field of cognitive science propose that thinking | ||
| - | involves the manipulation of internal representations | ||
| - | (mental models) of the external world (Matlin, | ||
| - | 1998:10). The schema concept, as developed by | ||
| - | Bartlett in 1932, still forms an integral part of the para- | ||
| - | digm of cognitive psychology. | ||