This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
structural_learning [2011/01/21 13:22] admin [Read more] |
— (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ===== Structural Learning ===== | ||
| - | Structural learning theory is one of the [[cognitivism|cognitist]] perspectives on instructional design proposed by [[http://www.scandura.com/|Joseph Scandura]]. Scandura's theory suggests human knowledge is consisted of rules. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Each rule, according to has domain, range and operation as its parameters. **Domain** refers to its **applicable inputs**, **range** refers its **expected outputs** and **operation** reffers to the **procedure on the inputs**. New rules are learned through application off higher to lower order rules. | ||
| - | |||
| - | In accordance with structural learning theory, first step in instructional design or learning is **definition of the problem domain through structural analysis**. Problem domain can be both well- and ill-defined (when rules are quite simple, yet there is no direct complete solution like chess, or poetry writing). In case of an ill-defined domain, it should be divided into well-defined sub-domains which generate at least one rule. Domain sets the inputs and desired outputs for problem solving. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Domain definition is followed by **construction of hierarchy of rules** for well-defined domains. Rules should be explained on prototype problems, but can also leave some **gaps** in problem solving procedure, which **are then converted into higher-order problems** containing gap rules. Higher-order rules are then used to fill the gap, but can also validate lower level rules. | ||
| - | |||
| - | An important part of the theory is also **prior knowledge (rules)** of the learner, that will **enable construction of new rules**. This knowledge can be examined by instructor, that can be both human or artificial. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Bibliography ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | [[http://web.cortland.edu/frieda/id/IDtheories/4.html|Structural Learning Theory.]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | [[http://www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Class_Websites/761_Spring_04/Assets/course_docs/ID_Theory_Reps_Sp04/Scandura_Chapman.pdf|Scandura, J. M. Structural learning theory. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status: p215–245. 1984.]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Read more ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Reigeluth, Charles M. Instructional-design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status. Routledge, 1983. | ||